<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>I guess I should switch the default calling convention and see what the code size difference is.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
- Jay<BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<HR id=EC_stopSpelling>
From: jayk123@hotmail.com<BR>To: hosking@cs.purdue.edu; hendrik@topoi.pooq.com<BR>Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:44:18 +0000<BR>CC: m3devel@elegosoft.com<BR>Subject: Re: [M3devel] __declspec(dllimport)?<BR><BR>
<META content="Microsoft SafeHTML" name=Generator>
<STYLE>
.ExternalClass .EC_hmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass EC_body.hmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}
</STYLE>
Smaller code is good, reduce memory pressure, processor speed ups hardly can fight memory use..<BR> <BR> - Jay<BR><BR><BR>
<HR id=EC_stopSpelling>
<BR>> From: hosking@cs.purdue.edu<BR>> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:59:40 -0500<BR>> To: hendrik@topoi.pooq.com<BR>> CC: m3devel@elegosoft.com<BR>> Subject: Re: [M3devel] __declspec(dllimport)?<BR>> <BR>> My thoughts exactly. Let's not expend effort for no gain!<BR>> <BR>> On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:42 AM, hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:23:47AM -0500, Tony Hosking wrote:<BR>> >> Do we know that this actually results in any real performance<BR>> >> improvement.<BR>> ><BR>> > Not clear -- hardware is getting pretty clever at doing at run-time <BR>> > the<BR>> > things that compilers used to sweat blood doing at compile time. I<BR>> > suspect that with fetch-and-branch-predictiong processors, the<BR>> > difference may<BR>> > unmeasurable.<BR>> ><BR>> > -- hendrik<BR>> <BR><BR><BR>
<HR>
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! <A href="http://biggestloser.msn.com/" target=_blank>Learn more.</A> </BLOCKQUOTE><br /><hr />Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give. <a href='http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join' target='_new'>Learn more.</a></body>
</html>