<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
getwd was my doing. Yeah I guess I'll workaround, with some sh. Sorry, I didn't realize.<br>I guess fs_cp same problem?<br>Tony "argues" for removing the useof getwd, but so far it seems to fix something that is actually a problem.<br>I think any release is ok...sort of.<br><br>> NT386 tests <br>NT386 tests aren't runnable, but presumably no major regression, right?<br>There is still the bitmap thing.<br><br>> AMD64<br>AMD64<br>Certainly ok to release without.<br>And you meant AMD64_NT/LINUX.<br>AMD64_DARWIN is already there from Tony.<br>:)<br><br>Am I going to have to stop checking in, or use a branch?<br><br> > needed features, blocking bugs <br><br>Just having new targets even in "prerelease" form are nice features already present:<br> AMD64_DARWIN (aka AMD64_MACOSX :) ) <br>
NT386GNU <br> NT386MINGNU (still without gui working due to __stdcall; I should workaround..) <br>plus:<br> Quake extensions <br> set relationship bug fix <br> non-interactive install <br> install-less archives possibly available <br> possible perf benefits from sleep() removal in Process <br><br>Would be nice to get PPC_LINUX up to pthreads but not high priority. <br><br>Not sure what the marketing department says, if this is "enough" to have a "major" release that everyone will "buy". :) <br><br>What's the "official" QA/release process anyway, for the daily snapshots, the snapshots I uploaded, vs. anything else? <br><br>Would be nice to see if .debs/.rpms could be made and available through "official" channels.<br><br><br> - Jay<br><br>> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:15:24 +0200<br>> From: wagner@elegosoft.com<br>> To: m3devel@elegosoft.com<br>> Subject: [M3devel] current tinderbox failures / new release?<br>> <br>> Currently builds of cm3 fail because quake's getwd is not in the<br>> last release (5.4.0) and so cannot be used for bootstrapping.<br>> Could somebody fix that?<br>> <br>> We really need to provide a new release soon to be able to safely use<br>> all the new functionality. But there are still no working tests on<br>> NT386*, and X64 porting seems to be underway.<br>> <br>> I think we should define a goal or milestone (we can even do that with<br>> trac), define the needed features or blocking bugs and work towards<br>> it.<br>> <br>> Or is everybody just as busy as I am and this is no good idea?<br>> <br>> Olaf<br>> -- <br>> Olaf Wagner -- elego Software Solutions GmbH<br>> Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25 / Gebäude 12, 13355 Berlin, Germany<br>> phone: +49 30 23 45 86 96 mobile: +49 177 2345 869 fax: +49 30 23 45 86 95<br>> http://www.elegosoft.com | Geschäftsführer: Olaf Wagner | Sitz: Berlin<br>> Handelregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 77719 | USt-IdNr: DE163214194<br>> <br></body>
</html>