<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
> If someone uses waitpid they get what they paid for. <BR>
<BR>
But someone is us -- m3core/libm3 (I think just m3core), sysutils, and then cm3 uses them.<BR>
<BR>
I guess there is a point that this "grand new interface" SchedulerPosix.DoesWaitPidYield has precious few users.<BR>
(It isn't grand. It takes no parameters and just returns a boolean, hardcoded, depending on thread library.)<BR>
<BR>
m3core now (today) uses it internally -- no need for a public interface.<BR>
Sysutils can't use it until the baseline m3core is newer, so arguably, not a user.<BR>
Instead (today) sysutils uses m3core's m3makefiles to decide the value.<BR>
<BR>
Heck, waitpid is therefore only used internally by m3core, and sysutils.<BR>
If sysutils could be (partly) merged into m3core, then m3core's waitpid need not be public.<BR>
<BR>
- Jay<BR><BR>> CC: mika<BR>> From: hosking<BR>> To: jay<BR>> Subject: Re: [M3devel] variations of waitpid..?<BR>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:29:24 +1100<BR>> <BR>> If someone uses waitpid they get what they paid for.<BR></body>
</html>