<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
eh, actually zchassis 3.6 matches current posix zchassis except for whitespace.<BR>
scrollertvbtclass is pretty close, though current adds "shadows".<BR>
Maybe we're ok in practise, but I still don't like it.<BR>
<BR>
(Really I'd love to ditch Trestle in favor of Qt or such, but I have this nagging<BR>
feeling that Trestle reinvents far more than most other gui libraries.)<BR>
<BR>
- Jay<BR> <BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
From: jay.krell@cornell.edu<BR>To: rcoleburn@scires.com; m3devel@elegosoft.com<BR>Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:41:25 +0000<BR>Subject: [M3devel] FW: Win32/ScrollerVBTClass.m3<BR><BR>
<STYLE>
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
</STYLE>
2008-05-27 02:29 rcoleburn<BR><BR> * m3-ui/vbtkit/src/: lego/m3makefile, vbtkitresources/ScrollBg,<BR> vbtkitresources/close.ppm, vbtkitresources/down.ppm,<BR> vbtkitresources/grow.ppm, vbtkitresources/left.ppm,<BR> vbtkitresources/m3makefile, vbtkitresources/right.ppm,<BR> vbtkitresources/up.ppm, lego/POSIX/ScrollerVBTClass.m3,<BR> lego/POSIX/ZChassisVBT.m3, lego/POSIX/m3makefile,<BR> vbtkitutils/m3makefile, lego/WIN32/ScrollerVBTClass.m3,<BR> lego/WIN32/ZChassisVBT.m3, lego/WIN32/m3makefile,<BR> vbtkitutils/POSIX/VBTKitEnv.i3, vbtkitutils/POSIX/m3makefile,<BR> vbtkitutils/WIN32/VBTKitEnv.i3, vbtkitutils/WIN32/m3makefile:<BR><BR> Incorporate changes made to vbtkit by Critical Mass circa September 1997 that make the GUI appearance more like that of Windows. The m3makefiles have been adjusted so that these changes affect only Windows (WIN32) platforms. These changes were part of work sponsored by Randy Coleburn at Scientific Research Corporation (SRC). The main files affected are VBTKitEnv.i3, ScrollerVBTClass.m3, and ZChassisVBT.m3, plus some new resource files have been added for WIN32 only.<BR><BR><BR>Randy, are files from 1997 really correct to incorporate into the tree 11 years later? Or maybe they are rather out of date?<BR>Can the work be redone against the 2008 versions? And factor out the common parts?<BR> <BR>I guess I should go and diff these against the 3.6 or 4.1 versions?<BR>And then apply those diffs to the Posix file to get the Win32 version?<BR>(Or again, try to share what is the same?)<BR> <BR> <BR> - Jay<BR> <BR>> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:37:34 +0000<BR>> To: m3commit@elegosoft.com<BR>> From: jkrell@elego.de<BR>> Subject: [M3commit] CVS Update: cm3<BR>> <BR>> CVSROOT: /usr/cvs<BR>> Changes by: jkrell@birch. 09/12/13 04:37:34<BR>> <BR>> Modified files:<BR>> cm3/m3-ui/vbtkit/src/lego/: Tag: release_branch_cm3_5_8 <BR>> m3makefile <BR>> cm3/m3-ui/vbtkit/src/lego/WIN32/: Tag: release_branch_cm3_5_8 <BR>> ScrollerVBTClass.m3 <BR>> <BR>> Log message:<BR>> I forgot to mention: I'm really just guessing here. It seems to work.<BR>> <BR> </body>
</html>