<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
I need to know if I can start moving targets up to a gcc 4.6 backend, given that I've removed the vast majority of the optimizer from it.<BR>I will test some of the targets, maybe not all of them.<BR> <BR> <BR>So far I386_DARWIN and AMD64_DARWIN work and I built boot/cross archives for a very large list, and I can run cm3 on Solaris also (I forget which architectures, there are 4, probably SPARC32 at least).<BR> <BR> <BR>Or if there is vehement rejection of a missing optimizer, I can abandon 4.6 and start work on 4.7 instead.<BR>I get tired of the unnecessary tedium that I invented, so with 4.7, I'll try to keep the diff small, in particular:<BR> keep the gmp/mpfr/mpc dependencies <BR> don't compile it with C++ (except parse.c) <BR> <BR> <BR>There is no longer a "core" distribution of gcc, but I'll still cut out vast swaths like all but the C and LTO frontends (Java, C++, Objective C, Objective C++, Fortran, Ada), all of the libraries (libjava, libada, libssp, libmudflap, libgfortran, libquadmath, libgcc, libstdc++, etc.)<BR> <BR> <BR>I know I have one rejection of this but that might not be enough.<BR> <BR> <BR>Tony?<BR> <BR> <BR> - Jay<br><br><br><BR> </div></body>
</html>