<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div id="x_compose-container" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/EmailMessage" style="direction:ltr">
<span itemprop="creator" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization"><span itemprop="name"></span></span>
<div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Please no. A relicense would be nice though-- BSD.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="x_acompli_signature">- Jay</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> M3devel <m3devel-bounces@elegosoft.com> on behalf of Darko Volaric <lists@darko.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 1, 2017 10:08:00 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> mika@async.caltech.edu<br>
<b>Cc:</b> m3devel@elegosoft.com<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [M3devel] On the way to release other packages in GPL?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Wait, there is a serious move toward releasing under GPL? Or have I misunderstood this email.<br>
<br>
<br>
> On Sep 1, 2017, at 6:30 PM, mika@async.caltech.edu wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Is there some consensus on what precisely needs to be extracted in terms<br>
> of a release? The Linux discussion earlier on this list made no sense<br>
> to me, it almost sounded like someone was wilfully misinterpreting the<br>
> plain English of the legalese.<br>
> <br>
> Also who is/has been the best lead so far? I can see if I can find<br>
> someone through various connections...<br>
> <br>
> Mika<br>
> <br>
> Hendrik Boom writes:<br>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 05:27:16PM +0000, Daniel Alejandro Benavides D. wro=<br>
>> te:<br>
>>> Hello:I fear most viable way to keep te language alive is to GPL it . Soo=<br>
>> n we wont have the resortes to keep alive. Im not understimating anyone her=<br>
>> e. But IMHO is de time to do it.=A0Thanks in advance<br>
>> <br>
>> Any GPL-compatible license will work. Even MIT. Possibly even the =<br>
>> <br>
>> so-called Creative Commons variation on public domain, which is =<br>
>> <br>
>> meaningful in jurisdictions without a concept of public domain.<br>
>> <br>
>> The hard part is liberating the parts of the system that are currently =<br>
>> <br>
>> inder the existing Modula 3 license. They will have to be replaced if =<br>
>> <br>
>> we can't get the copyright owner to respond usefully.<br>
>> <br>
>> And that's a lot of work.<br>
>> <br>
>> -- hendrik<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> M3devel mailing list<br>
>> M3devel@elegosoft.com<br>
>> <a href="https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel">https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> M3devel mailing list<br>
> M3devel@elegosoft.com<br>
> <a href="https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel">https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
M3devel mailing list<br>
M3devel@elegosoft.com<br>
<a href="https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel">https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel</a><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>