[M3devel] A RT failure in ThreadPThread.Alert]
Tony Hosking
hosking at cs.purdue.edu
Sat Sep 22 06:10:10 CEST 2007
The update I checked in earlier today does the trick.
On Sep 21, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Rodney M. Bates wrote:
> From a bit of code reading, it looks like:
>
> 1) FileBrowserVBT.m3 has been routinely doing this for a long time
> (Alerting a thread that has most likely already terminated), and
>
> 2) ThreadPosix tolerates this harmlessly.
>
> So, making ThreadPThread also tolerate it is probably the right fix.
>
> Tony Hosking wrote:
>> Hmmm. Perhaps there is a deeper problem.
>> On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Rodney M. Bates wrote:
>>> The Alert is coming from somewhere inside Trestle. I guess I
>>> need to
>>> look into that.
>>>
>>> Tony Hosking wrote:
>>>
>>>> waitCond should be valid for all live threads. I'm assuming
>>>> you are invoking Thread.Alert on a thread that is no longer
>>>> alive. Indeed, you can see from the debug output that the
>>>> thread has completed. I suppose we could silently ignore the
>>>> alert for a completed thread, but I suspect this reveals some
>>>> deeper problem with your code -- should you really issue an
>>>> alert to a thread that is incapable of receiving it. I wonder
>>>> if the alert flag is already set for that thread. In any case
>>>> I suppose we can simply check for NIL in Alert. I've checked
>>>> in code to do this.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Rodney M. Bates, retired assistant professor
>>> Dept. of Computer Science, Wichita State University
>>> Wichita, KS 67260-0083
>>> 316-978-3922
>>> rodney.bates at wichita.edu
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Rodney M. Bates, retired assistant professor
> Dept. of Computer Science, Wichita State University
> Wichita, KS 67260-0083
> 316-978-3922
> rodney.bates at wichita.edu
More information about the M3devel
mailing list