[M3devel] introducing VAR in more places?

[Jay]

Does anyone else find it bothersome that you can't introduce VARs anywhere? Kind of like in C++?
Ok, or if you grant that frame size doesn't matter THAT much, and the compiler might do stack packing anyway, you can move all your locals up top like typical C, but still, how about for the module initializer?
Still it seems good to me to do manual stack packing since it is often so easy..
WITH helps, but only for "relative constants".
 
It would be nice if the code below could have still loops until t0 != t1, but the repeat condition is outside the scope in which t1 is available. This feels quite lame..
 
 - Jay



> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:24:00 +0000> To: m3commit at elegosoft.com> From: jkrell at elego.de> Subject: [M3commit] CVS Update: cm3> > CVSROOT: /usr/cvs> Changes by: jkrell at birch. 08/02/11 10:24:00> > Modified files:> cm3/m3-libs/m3core/src/time/WIN32/: Time.m3 > > Log message:> no need for globals here..> 
_________________________________________________________________
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20080211/14c0c3c5/attachment-0001.html>