[M3devel] [M3commit] CVS Update: cm3

[Tony Hosking]

On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Jay wrote:

> > the infrastructure. So I'd rather vote that only new targets get
> > more systematic names.
>
> Of course, though the existing names suggest new names, and
> not clear the value of the existing NT386GNU. Ie. is there a benefit
> to keep it in use with some meaning or not?

Since others have made historic associations for the names we should  
probably keep their original meaning.  I agree with Olaf here.