[M3devel] m3 CVS?

[Tony Hosking]

CM3 has evolved significantly beyond PM3.  I switched over because PM3  
was getting a little crusty.

Antony Hosking | Associate Professor | Computer Science | Purdue  
University
305 N. University Street | West Lafayette | IN 47907 | USA
Office +1 765 494 6001 | Mobile +1 765 427 5484



On 1 Apr 2009, at 09:43, Jay wrote:

>  > And only feasible if the SRC source both forked from is still in  
> existence.
>
> The SRC 3.6 release is certainly available, not sure if that is what  
> they forked from.
>
> I do wonder:
>   - Does PM3 have anything we should salvage? Unknown.
>   - Does ezm3?
>   - Is CM3 the one true Modula-3? I guess not.
>      Or at least the "best" by far and the only one worth working  
> on? I think so.
>
>  - Jay
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:38:59 -0400
> > From: hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
> > To: m3devel at elegosoft.com
> > Subject: Re: [M3devel] m3 CVS?
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Olaf Wagner wrote:
> > > Quoting Tony Hosking <hosking at cs.purdue.edu>:
> > >
> > > >Both PM3 and CM3 forked from SRC M3.
> > >
> > > Yes, the releases both built on the SRC source, but as far as I  
> know
> > > there was never one repository where the history was combined.
> > >
> > > Olaf
> >
> > I suspect combining them would be more work than it's worth. And  
> only
> > feasible if the SRC source both forked from is still in existence.
> >
> > But tempting.
> >
> > -- hendrik

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090401/faaa0d61/attachment-0002.html>