[M3devel] HEADS UP: Release engineering, was: Re: CM3 Release
hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
Sat Apr 18 00:02:58 CEST 2009
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:54:13PM +1000, Tony Hosking wrote:
>
> On 15 Apr 2009, at 02:56, Mika Nystrom wrote:
>
> >
> >I agree with what Hendrik says, but what about TYPECASE, ISTYPE,
> >NARROW? Those are necessary to make it possible to pass "pointers"
> >with the low-order bit set outside of unsafe code.
> >
> >My feeling is that if Tony can make the necessary changes, it could
should
> >be done immediately, and the language issues can be pushed to the
> >future. But admittedly I'm biased because of the application I'm
> >working on.
>
> I can take care of this next week.
I'm in favour of trying it out before freezing the feature. That
means going ahead now with an implementation, and reconsidering it
in a few months. Perhaps marking it experimental with an appropriate
warning message. A few months is little enough time to use it that it
won't be traumatic if code that uses the new features has to be
partially rewritten.
-- hendrik
More information about the M3devel
mailing list