[M3devel] Latest ThreadPThread
Jay
jay.krell at cornell.edu
Tue Apr 21 06:13:23 CEST 2009
Question is whether or not it is interesting to have fewer of those very thin pthread wrappers or not. This has fewer of them. Not clearly worthwhile. I can it put back later.
- Jay
From: hosking at cs.purdue.edu
To: jay.krell at cornell.edu
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:53:05 +1000
CC: m3devel at elegosoft.com
Subject: [M3devel] Latest ThreadPThread
Jay,
I have some questions about why you have moved the Activation declaration to C code. I'm not sure what this gains, and I have strong reasons for wanting to keep it in Modula-3. I'd like to revert these most recent changes if possible, unless you can say why you want to retain them. Perhaps you have a good reason, but I remain to be convinced.
-- Tony
Antony Hosking | Associate Professor | Computer Science | Purdue University
305 N. University Street | West Lafayette | IN 47907 | USA
Office +1 765 494 6001 | Mobile +1 765 427 5484
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090421/feb0ea61/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the M3devel
mailing list