[M3devel] Latest ThreadPThread

Jay jay.krell at cornell.edu
Tue Apr 21 06:13:23 CEST 2009


Question is whether or not it is interesting to have fewer of those very thin pthread wrappers or not. This has fewer of them. Not clearly worthwhile. I can it put back later.

 

 - Jay

 


From: hosking at cs.purdue.edu
To: jay.krell at cornell.edu
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:53:05 +1000
CC: m3devel at elegosoft.com
Subject: [M3devel] Latest ThreadPThread


Jay,


I have some questions about why you have moved the Activation declaration to C code.  I'm not sure what this gains, and I have strong reasons for wanting to keep it in Modula-3.  I'd like to revert these most recent changes if possible, unless you can say why you want to retain them.  Perhaps you have a good reason, but I remain to be convinced.


-- Tony



Antony Hosking | Associate Professor | Computer Science | Purdue University
305 N. University Street | West Lafayette | IN 47907 | USA
Office +1 765 494 6001 | Mobile +1 765 427 5484

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090421/feb0ea61/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the M3devel mailing list