[M3devel] ROOT, $ORIGIN, runpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, symlinks, hardlinks, etc.
Jay
jay.krell at cornell.edu
Thu Jul 2 22:03:16 CEST 2009
- Previous message (by thread): [M3devel] ROOT, $ORIGIN, runpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, symlinks, hardlinks, etc.
- Next message (by thread): [M3devel] ROOT, $ORIGIN, runpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, symlinks, hardlinks, etc.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Ok, so I think a very important question is:
>>> Should users have a choice of where to install?
>>> What are the reasonable ramifications of someone who makes a non-default choice?
/Personally/ I want the choice, esp. if I don't have root access!, and I don't want to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
I want my choice and no negative consequences, and $origin basically gives me that.
Except NetBSD prior to 5.0. 5.0 already released.
And I guess Solaris prior to 2.7 or such.
We do agree on a change vs. previous releases, at least.
And it overlaps with what I did already.
- Jay
CC: wagner at elegosoft.com; m3devel at elegosoft.com
From: hosking at cs.purdue.edu
To: jay.krell at cornell.edu
Subject: Re: [M3devel] ROOT, $ORIGIN, runpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, symlinks, hardlinks, etc.
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:59:25 -0400
I agree, LD_LIBRARY_PATH should only be used by power-users in a pinch during development.
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:56, Jay wrote:
Here are some good links, other people trying to explain this stuff:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090702/575e65ba/attachment-0002.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [M3devel] ROOT, $ORIGIN, runpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, symlinks, hardlinks, etc.
- Next message (by thread): [M3devel] ROOT, $ORIGIN, runpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, symlinks, hardlinks, etc.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the M3devel
mailing list