[M3devel] ***SPAM*** Re: Probably missing too much of development sycle, but WTF?

[Dragiša Durić]

This is nice idea, but I think it means much more C code than current
Uconstants...

Actually, I like new approach. It's only it's (in)completeness that
disturbs me :)

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 23:44 -0700, Mika Nystrom wrote:
> These things are constant for a given binary distribution, aren't
> they?  Can they be left to some sort of bootstrapping step on the
> target system, or at least (if cross-compiling) in an environment
> where target C headers are available?
> 
> I mean printing out an M3 interface based on the C header's defined
> values.
> 
>     Mika
-- 
Dragiša Durić <dragisha at m3w.org>