[M3devel] m3back directions?

[Tony Hosking]

All of PM3 is licensed the same way as CM3 (they both derive from the same DEC SRC sources).


On 1 Apr 2010, at 08:33, Jay K wrote:

> I think it was GPL though.
>  
>  - Jay
>  
> > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:33:13 +0200
> > From: wagner at elegosoft.com
> > To: hosking at cs.purdue.edu
> > CC: m3devel at elegosoft.com
> > Subject: Re: [M3devel] m3back directions?
> > 
> > Quoting Tony Hosking <hosking at cs.purdue.edu>:
> > 
> > > On 31 Mar 2010, at 06:18, wagner at elegosoft.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> Quoting Jay K <jay.krell at cornell.edu>:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm curious what, if anything, people are interested in in m3back?
> > >>>
> > >>> There are several mostly independent directions:
> > >>>
> > >>> - remove it; use the gcc backend or other (burg, llvm, generate C)
> > >>>
> > >>> - expand to support other targets, AMD64_*, including AMD64_NT
> > >>>
> > >>> m3objfile would need macho/elf support for non-NT
> > >>
> > >> It would be great if we could use the integrated backend for other
> > >> targets, too. Adding ELF support will be a lot of work, but it's probably
> > >> worth it.
> > >
> > > Have you looked at the pm3 Linux support?
> > 
> > Indeed I had forgotten about that. I'll take at look at the Easter
> > holidays,
> > 
> > Olaf
> > 
> > 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20100401/b48394b3/attachment-0002.html>