[M3devel] Integers
Tony Hosking
hosking at cs.purdue.edu
Fri Jan 8 20:36:18 CET 2010
On 8 Jan 2010, at 14:04, hendrik at topoi.pooq.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:10:28AM -0600, Rodney M. Bates wrote:
>>
>> What's unique about Modula-3 is that such representation changes are
>> left to the compiler, while the language merely views values as
>> sometimes belonging to more than one type, and allows such values to be
>> assigned when so. The usual approach in other languages is to elevate
>> the representation change from a machine-level matter to a language-
>> level matter by treating it as an implicit type change in addition to
>> a representation change. The result is always a lot of unnecessary
>> complexity in the language.
> ...
> ...
>>>
>>> Where in the language is it important that INTEGER and LONGINT be
>>> different base types? In other words, what advantages does this
>>> separation convey?
>>
>> One thing that is very much needed in a language (not the only thing)
>> is a type that always matches the implementation's native arithmetic
>> size, which is most efficient. If you don't distinguish this type,
>> it becomes either impossible or horribly convoluted to define arithmetic
>> so native machine arithmetic can be usually used where possible,
>> but multi-word arithmetic will be used where needed.
>
> Yes. You do need this type. And you can even call it INTEGER. But is
> there any reason it cannot be a predefined subrange type of LONGINT?
I sense confusion here...
INTEGER is not a subrange type.
Neither is LONGINT.
More information about the M3devel
mailing list