[M3devel] cvsup fix refinements
Jay K
jay.krell at cornell.edu
Fri Mar 19 18:21:13 CET 2010
diffs attached
For now I've removed the Get/SetNextForkWillExec.
I also think truly get/set is right, not inc/dec.
It was confusing enough to interpret and initialize
the value. And it is also not clear what the default
should be. The usual behavor is exec does follow fork.
The safer default if the handlers work ok is to assume
exec will not follow. It is a perf hint or a don't change
how things were hint? Hint to speed up fork+exec or hint
to avoid running the new code that might not work?
(For now I've removed the Get/SetNextForkWillExec.)
They'd have to be implemented three times, and
I had trouble defining them.
Obviously Win32/userthreads just return a
hardcoded true, but it is hard to explain
from the caller of Get's point of view.
Maybe:
SetNextForkWillExec
GetNextForkWillExec
and then:
PThreadAtForkNeeded() = GetNextForkWillExec = FALSE ?
That is,
someone is who is calling fork and possibly exec,
can immediately tell what these functions mean.
But the implementer of an atfork handler has to
do quite a semantic translation I think.
I wrote it backwards the first time. That either
implies it is confusing, or I wasn't thinking.
If it really is a problem to run this stuff when exec
will follow, we should know quickly, as building cm3
is an aggressive user of this code.
This version has worked repeatedly on Darwin.
I didn't test user threads but it is structured such
as to make that obviously work.
The cvsup changes are in pthreaad_atfork handlers,
so no change for userthreads.
I didn't test on others but confidence is quite high now.
description of changes at least where they are hard to read:
m3core:
Init split into Init and InitWithStackBase,
We have to provide the old stack base in the child fork handler
instead of estimating from the address of a local. I don't
know what stack is used, maybe the caller of fork?
i.e. we might have eaten a fair amount of stack and
there could be arbitrary references above the current stack.
WeakRefFromRef split into WeakRefFromRef and StartWeakCleaner
There is a resulting double lock in WeakRefFromRef, every time.
Could instead copy/paste more code around, i.e.:
EVAL Thread.Fork(NEW(Thread.Closure, apply := WeakCleaner));
- Jay
From: jay.krell at cornell.edu
To: m3devel at elegosoft.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:01:03 +0000
Subject: [M3devel] cvsup fix refinements
refinements:
new public functions in m3core:
TYPE PThreadForkHandler = PROCEDURE();
<* EXTERNAL RTOS__PThreadAtFork *>
PROCEDURE PThreadAtFork(prep, parent, child: PThreadForkHandler): INTEGER;
(That's not a change yet.)
PROCEDURE SetNextForkWillExec(value: BOOLEAN);
PROCEDURE GetNextForkWillExec(): BOOLEAN;
These are only an optimization and should
perhaps be removed? They should be used
under LockHeap/UnlockHeap? which wasn't previously
public. This way, existing fork/exec paths
not affected, though maybe though might as well
ought to be?
could go in any of ThreadF, RTOS, RTProcess?
Should be called under RTOS.LockHeap?
Therefore I put in RTOS.
Also helps that RTOS is exported from *Thread.m3.
RTOS not previously public.
Should Get/Set be Inc/Dec? (therefore just Inc with +1,-1?)
I implemented them that way: true incs, false decs.
Or don't bother with them at all?
Furthermore, in RTCollector, instead of claiming the threads
aren't started, if they were started, restart them.
This makes more sense for the weak cleaner to me, and
seems reasonable for the other two.
Diffs not yet available.
- Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20100319/331e029e/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: atfork2-cvsup.txt
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20100319/331e029e/attachment-0004.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: atfork2-m3core.txt
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20100319/331e029e/attachment-0005.txt>
More information about the M3devel
mailing list