[M3devel] bind_segment vs. declare_segment?

[Jay K]

> >  > It's inevitable that we have types referenced before defined because of recursion in the type definitions.


As long as it is a pointer, I think that is easy and I understand.


But granted, I think it is messed up in m3 today.


I think m3front always says:
  record with n fields
  immediately followed by n fields


And there is no forward declaration mechanism.


We could probably use
  forward declare record

  
That just gives the typeid.


I have to look in more detail.
I'm just speaking from memory here, and not all of the details
have ever been, let alone remain, in my memory.

Thanks,
 - Jay

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20101123/d824dd65/attachment-0002.html>