[M3devel] JIT [WAS: Google Benchmark - anyone interested in an Modula 3 version?]

[Daniel Alejandro Benavides D.]

Hi all:
I think yes, any other full bloated object oriented language has that floor, of course, you can help the compiler by giving some annotations, but for the theoretical results, this is what is proved to be truth.

Thanks in advance

--- El lun, 4/7/11, Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com> escribió:

> De: Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
> Asunto: Re: [M3devel] JIT [WAS: Google Benchmark - anyone interested in an Modula 3 version?]
> Para: m3devel at elegosoft.com
> Fecha: lunes, 4 de julio, 2011 19:13
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:08:54PM
> +0100, Daniel Alejandro Benavides D. wrote:
> > 
> > So this time I'm happy to be wrong, we can do indeed
> JIT but we should 
> > measure the cost (as for type inference could for
> **imp**ç run O(n^3) 
> > and currently run O(n^5), it might be necessary do
> decompiling plus 
> > naturally compiling and forth inc ase of NetObj, etc
> 
> O(n^3)? O(n^5)? If that's performance in practical
> situations, instead 
> of just a class of theoretical examples it's not what we
> need for 
> everyday use.  I'd call it useless.  It's
> defnietely not what I'm 
> thinking of. 
> 
> -- hendrik
>