[M3devel] missing m3gdb?

Daniel Alejandro Benavides D. dabenavidesd at yahoo.es
Tue Jun 19 18:28:33 CEST 2012


Hi all:
I don't think is so much a waste of time, if compiler has done well, you don't need to make a debugger, but instead if it hasn't done it well, don't waste more time use a different compiler (optimized).
ESC had a X postfix for every package name that has been verified so you could have a different verified and compiled version and as a reference for program behavior and then use an experimental debug able version.
That was the idea with a Module system with separate compilation and version stamps, IMHO, to really have a fast to execute and easy to debug around cycle and you need that lately as compiler versions are getting faster or harder to debug.
The interesting stuff is whether you could use the same infrastructure to verify in less time or not, that will proof ESC is worth of anything which I'm sure no body uses for that reasoning broken -not Dragisha's nor Hendrick- but most people do ahead of time.
Thanks in advance

--- El mar, 19/6/12, Dragiša Durić <dragisha at m3w.org> escribió:

De: Dragiša Durić <dragisha at m3w.org>
Asunto: Re: [M3devel] missing m3gdb?
Para: "Hendrik Boom" <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
CC: "m3devel" <m3devel at elegosoft.com>
Fecha: martes, 19 de junio, 2012 11:08

Short answer: If you need m3gdb - use 5.8.6 release version.
On Jun 19, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Having downloaded the development version in mid-May and succeeded in 
biulding cm3-all-AMD64_LINUX-d5.9.0-20120518.deb.  I then removed my 
existing Modula 3, installed the new .deb, and proceeded to use it with 
no problems until today.

Today tried to use the debugger, and discovered that m3gdb is missing.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20120619/51b08458/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the M3devel mailing list