[M3devel] C backend -- mode or call quake?
mika at async.caltech.edu
mika at async.caltech.edu
Wed Oct 17 20:23:59 CEST 2012
It was a little difficult to find, but here it is...
https://mail.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3commit/2011-February/009784.html
Note I don't know how good pthreads are nowadays. It works fine with
user threads... last time I tried it with pthreads my compiler hung, but
I know there have been fixes since then.
Mika
"Rodney M. Bates" writes:
>
>
>On 10/15/2012 01:35 PM, mika at async.caltech.edu wrote:
>> Jay K writes:
>> ...
>>> "External" anything is convenient for development and testing=2C bad for pe=
>>> rformance. It writes and reads the .mc files. Besides development/testin=
>>> g=2C it also is used for licensing reasons -- communication through files i=
>>> nstead of "linking" code.
>> ...
>>
>> Jay you keep coming back to this issue of the performance of the compiler.
>> Do you use Modula-3 for some large projects I'm not aware of? I compile
>> quite a bit of code with it, and sure it would be cool (always is) if it
>> were faster but it's not like the lack of speed has ever bothered me (not
>> since the silly 0.1-second delay was removed from Process.Wait). I also
>> implemented a parallelized back-end mode a while ago (it's in the tree).
>
>I didn't know that. Any experience on how stable it is? Time compiling
>isn't a huge issue for me either, but now that we all have n cores on a
>chip, for growing n, and little way to utilize them, that would indeed
>be cool.
>
>> The speed of the compiler is mainly an issue when recompiling the world,
>> which is something that happens mainly during "development/testing",
>> and then not by regular users, normally...
>>
>> Mika
>>
More information about the M3devel
mailing list