[M3devel] state of atomic implementation in cm3/C?

[Jay K]

It has actually always looked pretty complete to me in cm3cg.
At least for most architectures. Some were a little challenged, like PowerPC.
But maybe the spec wasn't correct?
What is needed?
Anyway, I'll work on M3C.

I did update M3x86.m3 and it might be complete.

 - Jay

________________________________
> Subject: Re: [M3devel] state of atomic implementation in cm3/C? 
> From: antony.hosking at gmail.com 
> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 02:03:32 -0400 
> CC: jay.krell at cornell.edu; m3devel at elegosoft.com 
> To: dragisha at m3w.org 
> 
> Incomplete. 
> 
> On Oct 17, 2013, at 1:54 AM, Dragiša Durić 
> <dragisha at m3w.org<mailto:dragisha at m3w.org>> wrote: 
> 
> And what is exact state of Atomic support in cm3cg backend? Anthony? 
> 
> TIA 
> -- 
> Dragiša Durić 
> dragisha at m3w.org<mailto:dragisha at m3w.org> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Jay K wrote: 
> 
> eek, good question. 
> No. 
> 
> 
> load/store do the load and store, but not atomically. 
> And other operations are silently omitted! 
> Not good! 
> I'll work on that.. 
> 
> 
> - Jay 
> 
> ________________________________ 
> From: dragisha at m3w.org<mailto:dragisha at m3w.org> 
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:56:28 +0200 
> To: m3devel at elegosoft.com<mailto:m3devel at elegosoft.com> 
> Subject: [M3devel] state of atomic implementation in cm3? 
> 
> Jay, had you implemented atomics in M3C? 
> 
> TIA 
> -- 
> Dragiša Durić 
> dragisha at m3w.org<mailto:dragisha at m3w.org><mailto:dragisha at m3w.org> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>