[M3devel] m3cgc1: fatal error: *** bad M3CG version stamp (0x100), expected 0x110

[Rodney M. Bates]

I am quite sure that the cm3/cm3cg incompatibility is two-way, i.e.,
both must be new or both old.  So, I would expect INSTALL_CM3_IN_BIN=yes
to fail regardless of the order of building the two.

OTOH, if cm3 were built and shipped, then m3cc came immediately after,
it should work, because m3cc contains no Modula-3 code, and the new
cm3 would not, when building it, run cm3cg.  After that, there would
be a consistent set. for further compiles.  But any package containing
M3 code built between cm3 and m3cc would fail.

On 05/31/2015 05:15 PM, Jay wrote:
> I think now it might not be the problem. Could be m3cc needs to be later in pkginfo.txt. I have to try later.
>
>   - Jay
>
> On May 31, 2015, at 10:59 AM, John Marino <adacore at marino.st> wrote:
>
>> I removed "INSTALL_CM3_IN_BIN=yes" after reading the thread about it.
>> Should I put it back?  From the last response I'm guessing that wasn't
>> the problem.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On 5/31/2015 19:09, Jay K wrote:
>>> Oh probably the problem is using the backend premature actually.
>>> Darn, I can't help right now.
>>>
>>> - Jay
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> From: jay.krell at cornell.edu
>>> To: adacore at marino.st; m3devel at elegosoft.com
>>> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 16:45:42 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: [M3devel] m3cgc1: fatal error: *** bad M3CG version stamp
>>> (0x100), expected 0x110
>>>
>>> Hm. Strange. I need to read more closely. I see it skipping shipping,
>>> but my read was it didn't try that.
>>> So.. with INSTALL_CM3_IN_BIN=yes?
>>> I need to try this all, and "fix" it to set that. The whole thing in
>>> m3cc/src/m3makefile is relatively
>>> new vs. when I was actively using all this. :(
>>>
>>> - Jay
>>>
>>>
>>>> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 16:57:02 +0200
>>>> From: adacore at marino.st
>>>> To: jay.krell at cornell.edu; m3devel at elegosoft.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [M3devel] m3cgc1: fatal error: *** bad M3CG version stamp
>>> (0x100), expected 0x110
>>>>
>>>> On 5/31/2015 11:53, Jay K wrote:
>>>>> John, have you tried make-dist.py?
>>>>> i.e.
>>> https://github.com/modula3/cm3/blob/master/scripts/python/make-dist.py
>>>>>
>>>>> While it might not be exactly what you need, it should demonstrate the
>>>>> elements.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will try to try this all soon, really, I hope so.
>>>>>
>>>>> It starts with a working compiler, does no in-place updates, build into
>>>>> a unique directory in /tmp, and gives you .tar.gz or such at the end.
>>>>> It does "min" and "all".
>>>>>
>>>>> If you set the STAGE environment variable, it uses that instead of /tmp.
>>>>> It should probably be called M3_STATE or M3_MAKEDIST_STAGE.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jay
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jay,
>>>> I'm getting the same error as always using make-dist script:
>>>> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/m3d.log
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> John
>

-- 
Rodney Bates
rodney.m.bates at acm.org