[M3devel] replace build system??
jay.krell at cornell.edu
Tue May 31 19:18:46 CEST 2016
We should probably learn how to get the number of processors and optionally system load and make this more automatic.
Posix should standardize more of this. :(
> To: estellnb at elstel.org; jay.krell at cornell.edu; m3devel at elegosoft.com
> To: dabenavidesd at yahoo.es
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:16:05 -0700
> From: mika at async.caltech.edu
> Subject: Re: [M3devel] replace build system??
> I mentioned this before a few times on this mailing list.... CM3 is already fairly
> parallel if you turn on the right options. Every back-end invocation can be done
> in parallel.
> Set M3_PARALLEL_BACK in the config to 10 or 20 and watch it go...
> "Daniel Alejandro Benavides D." writes:
>>A make-based build solution would have other advantages as well like=20
>>f.i. parallel build by make --jobs=3D4. That way CM3 could build up to=20
>>four times faster.
> M3devel mailing list
> M3devel at elegosoft.com
More information about the M3devel