[M3devel] type mismatches?
Tony Hosking
hosking at cs.purdue.edu
Tue Apr 22 19:02:47 CEST 2008
This happens whenever you add a new target to the compiler. You need
to bootstrap a new compiler with the old libraries (m3core, libm3)
before trying to build the new libraries containing the new
Compiler.tmpl.
On Apr 22, 2008, at 8:52 AM, Jay wrote:
>
> 4797 NEXT Fatal Error: bad version stamps: SocketPosix.m3
> 4798
> 4799 version stamp mismatch: Compiler.Platform
> 4800 => SocketPosix.m3
> 4801 => Compiler.i3
> 4802 version stamp mismatch: Compiler.ThisPlatform
> 4803 => SocketPosix.m3
> 4804 => Compiler.i3
>
> This is now in the Tinderbox, on some machines, e.g. FreeBSD4.
> I have two source trees on same machine sharing same install root,
> one sees it, one does not.
> Even though I start the install root out by extracting the same
> initial snapshot, I think.
> I think they are the same except for path but that needs scrutiny.
>
> I am making SOME attempt to isolate it, but I'm not looking forward
> to it..
> One expensive potshot is wait for a full hours-long gcc build with
> no switches.
> In case it is a cm3cg problem, emanating from the compiler used to
> build cm3cg.
> (I just did another build of cm3cg, took 11 minutes..)
>
> That is:
> There is a problem here. It's not just me. I MIGHT find it.
> If anyone can save me the trouble, please do. :)
>
> Other potshots include more conservative codegen like -fno-reorder-
> blocks -mno-double-align -O0, some/all of which are already in use.
> I was going to commit blindly such conservatism for FreeBSD4,
> however my local repro is persisting despite this.
>
> It could still be some simple bootstrapping issue. I don't know.
>
> SocketPosix is only using Compiler for some dormant platforms. The
> code is probably dead.
> But hey, extra dead code finds extra live bugs. :)
>
> Question:
> Am I correct that, in the absence of cm3/cm3cg/underlying bugs, the
> following should never occur:
> cd .../m3core
> rm -rf
> cm3
> cm3 -ship
> cd ../libm3
> rm -rf
> cm3
> => version stamp mismatch
>
> ? That is -- if this happens, it can't be any bootstrapping problem?
> These checks are libm3 vs. m3core, right? What the compiler itself is?
>
> - Jay
More information about the M3devel
mailing list