[M3devel] __declspec(dllimport)?

[Jay]

I guess I should switch the default calling convention and see what the code size difference is.
 
 
 - Jay


From: jayk123 at hotmail.comTo: hosking at cs.purdue.edu; hendrik at topoi.pooq.comDate: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:44:18 +0000CC: m3devel at elegosoft.comSubject: Re: [M3devel] __declspec(dllimport)?


Smaller code is good, reduce memory pressure, processor speed ups hardly can fight memory use..  - Jay

> From: hosking at cs.purdue.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:59:40 -0500> To: hendrik at topoi.pooq.com> CC: m3devel at elegosoft.com> Subject: Re: [M3devel] __declspec(dllimport)?> > My thoughts exactly. Let's not expend effort for no gain!> > On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:42 AM, hendrik at topoi.pooq.com wrote:> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:23:47AM -0500, Tony Hosking wrote:> >> Do we know that this actually results in any real performance> >> improvement.> >> > Not clear -- hardware is getting pretty clever at doing at run-time > > the> > things that compilers used to sweat blood doing at compile time. I> > suspect that with fetch-and-branch-predictiong processors, the> > difference may> > unmeasurable.> >> > -- hendrik> 

Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! Learn more. 
_________________________________________________________________
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20080211/79e374f9/attachment-0002.html>