[M3devel] reactor: catalyst vs cm3-ide
Roland Illig
roland.illig at gmx.de
Sun Jan 27 17:23:02 CET 2008
Randy Coleburn wrote:
> Ok, I've gotten some feedback on the new name for reactor.
>
> I've attached a PDF that has two pages: one depicts use of Catalyst,
> the other CM3-IDE.
>
> Please let me know which you prefer.
If these are going to become logos of any kind, I don't like them both.
- They use lots of different font shapes and sizes. This makes the image
rather complicated. A logo should use at most one font shape.
- There are lots of components in the logo. To view them all, it takes a
long time. A logo should be as simple that one can recognize it at a glance.
- What does the battery have to do with Modula-3?
- How does it relate to the light bulb?
- What does the "With Power" on the light bulb mean? Is it important for
the logo?
- Is there any prior art for these kinds of logos?
Roland
More information about the M3devel
mailing list