[M3devel] reactor: catalyst vs cm3-ide

[Dirk Muysers]

What others have done along the same lines:
Have a look at the Cocotron (http://www.cocotron.org/Info)

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Roland Illig" <roland.illig at gmx.de>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 5:23 PM
To: "Randy Coleburn" <rcoleburn at scires.com>
Cc: <m3devel at elegosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [M3devel] reactor: catalyst vs cm3-ide

> Randy Coleburn wrote:
>> Ok, I've gotten some feedback on the new name for reactor.
>>  I've attached a PDF that has two pages:  one depicts use of Catalyst, 
>> the other CM3-IDE.
>>  Please let me know which you prefer.
>
> If these are going to become logos of any kind, I don't like them both.
>
> - They use lots of different font shapes and sizes. This makes the image 
> rather complicated. A logo should use at most one font shape.
>
> - There are lots of components in the logo. To view them all, it takes a 
> long time. A logo should be as simple that one can recognize it at a 
> glance.
>
> - What does the battery have to do with Modula-3?
>
> - How does it relate to the light bulb?
>
> - What does the "With Power" on the light bulb mean? Is it important for 
> the logo?
>
> - Is there any prior art for these kinds of logos?
>
> Roland
>