[M3devel] package groups question
jay.krell at cornell.edu
jay.krell at cornell.edu
Sat Aug 1 08:51:41 CEST 2009
| From what I've gleaned in the discussions and the current
documentation, I think most everyone has settled on the idea of having
2 "binary" distributions for this release: "min" and "std".
>
Really? How about just "std" and don't even label it as such? How many
expert users are clamoring for "min"?
There was actually a push for several non overlaping package sets and
Olaf did work for that. But I'm not sure that is worth it.
- Jay
More information about the M3devel
mailing list