[M3devel] package groups question

jay.krell at cornell.edu jay.krell at cornell.edu
Sat Aug 1 08:51:41 CEST 2009


| From what I've gleaned in the discussions and the current  
documentation, I think most everyone has settled on the idea of having  
2 "binary" distributions for this release:  "min" and "std".
>

Really? How about just "std" and don't even label it as such? How many  
expert users are clamoring for "min"?

There was actually a push for several non overlaping package sets and  
Olaf did work for that. But I'm not sure that is worth it.

  - Jay





More information about the M3devel mailing list