[M3devel] portable hosting

Daniel Alejandro Benavides D. dabenavidesd at yahoo.es
Wed May 30 17:13:13 CEST 2012


Hi all:
I think the issue is back to the stream media, since a JVM ready product was only to be Sun JVM ready, so, any other implementation was both a product officially unrelated and JVM ready. I don't know how SUN thought about JIT-compilers, etc.
Thanks in advance


--- El mié, 30/5/12, microcode at zoho.com <microcode at zoho.com> escribió:

De: microcode at zoho.com <microcode at zoho.com>
Asunto: Re: [M3devel] portable hosting
Para: m3devel at elegosoft.com
Fecha: miércoles, 30 de mayo, 2012 09:11

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are asking. 

As much as I loathe WikiPedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Java_virtual_machines


Is a good starting point. I am pretty sure there are dozens more not listed there though. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:51:14 
To: <m3devel at elegosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [M3devel] portable hosting

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:26:04PM +0000, microcode at zoho.com wrote:
> There are tons of Java JVMs. IBM wrote at least two. 

Arethese multiple implementatioa of the same intermediate code?  Or 
completely different intermediate codes?

-- hendrik

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:20:57 
> To: <m3devel at elegosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [M3devel] portable hosting
> 
> I've only heard of two different Java virtual machines -- the one Sun 
> wrote, which I believe has been independently implementedonce or twice, 
> and the one Google wrote as part of Android, which is designed for 
> efficient JIT compilation.
> 
> Is this one of these, or is there yet another?
> 
> -- hendrik
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:34:24PM +0100, Daniel Alejandro Benavides D. wrote:
> > Hi all:
> > I like the option but because there isn't more than that in a featured 
> > phone, which is the most common kind of thing in this world; S40, has 
> > its own JVM, if this about popularity.
> > Crazy and simple as it is.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> > 
> > --- El mié, 30/5/12, Dragiša Durić <dragisha at m3w.org> escribió:
> > 
> > > De: Dragiša Durić <dragisha at m3w.org>
> > > Asunto: Re: [M3devel] portable hosting
> > > Para: "Daniel Alejandro Benavides D." <dabenavidesd at yahoo.es>
> > > CC: m3devel at elegosoft.com, "Hendrik Boom" <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
> > > Fecha: miércoles, 30 de mayo, 2012 03:54
> > > Daniel,
> > > 
> > > I like your project. Please inform us on updates, when
> > > available!
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > dd
> > > 
> > > p.s. :)
> > > 
> > > On May 28, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Daniel Alejandro Benavides D.
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi all:
> > > > or better make an assembly-coded C compiler in a Java
> > > language processor, and cross-boot assemble from a Modula-3
> > > environment there so you could bootstrap a M3CG-system
> > > there.
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > > 
> > > > --- El lun, 28/5/12, Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
> > > escribió:
> > > > 
> > > >> De: Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com>
> > > >> Asunto: [M3devel] portable hosting
> > > >> Para: m3devel at elegosoft.com
> > > >> Fecha: lunes, 28 de mayo, 2012 11:50
> > > >> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:32:14PM
> > > >> -0700, Jay wrote:
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Btw, rewriting all of m3front in C or C++ or
> > > Java
> > > >> probably wouldn't be very difficult.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Would it be more or less difficult than writing a
> > > code
> > > >> generator that 
> > > >> generated C or C++ code?  THe code generator
> > > could do
> > > >> the rewrite for 
> > > >> you.  Bt it wouldn't be very readable code.
> > > >> 
> > > 
> > >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20120530/d325b80d/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the M3devel mailing list