[M3devel] Output from "cron" command

[Jay]

On the 2nd point I'll soon have m3c interface to quake. For performance w/o adding another "mode". But having a separate executable going via .mc files is great for development and testing.


On the 1st point..I added files, didn't change, as I recall. No difference if they are in m3back or m3middle. I found that decision unclear -- m3back vs m3middle.
What I added is likely useful to other backend writers. Very generic.
 

I really think this is about the right design. But code can be split up and moved fairly arbitrarily, cluttering the tree with more directories & libraries...


The m3cgcat change is elegant and not a hack imo & very few people know about or understand this stuff, there shouldn't be much chance for confusion, but whatever....


 - Jay (briefly/pocket-sized-computer-aka-phone)

On Oct 5, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Antony Hosking <hosking at cs.purdue.edu> wrote:

> Jay, is there any chance we can put your M3C backend stuff in a separate library.
> I don’t understand why we are adding clutter to m3middle.
> 
> Similarly, your hacks to m3cgcat to run your C backend should be duplicated in the C backend space rather than in m3cgcat.
> 
> I’d prefer to keep m3middle as pristine as it was previously if only to avoid confusion for others.
>