[M3devel] alternate implementation of opaque types?

Sun Apr 7 10:03:46 CEST 2013

I second this. I never had problems with these  instances of "over-compilation". Why bother, and why introduce possible problems down the road by fixing what is not broken?
--
Dragiša Durić
dragisha at m3w.org

On Apr 6, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Jay K wrote:

> With my proposed change, you can recompile less actually. Though we probably wouldn't bother.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20130407/03bb17fa/attachment-0002.html>