[M3devel] alternate implementation of opaque types?
Tony Hosking
hosking at cs.purdue.edu
Sun Apr 7 13:10:03 CEST 2013
There can be multiple levels of opacity.
So I don’t see how you would do this.
On Apr 7, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Dragiša Durić <dragisha at m3w.org> wrote:
> I second this. I never had problems with these instances of "over-compilation". Why bother, and why introduce possible problems down the road by fixing what is not broken?
> --
> Dragiša Durić
> dragisha at m3w.org
>
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Jay K wrote:
>
>> With my proposed change, you can recompile less actually. Though we probably wouldn't bother.
>
Antony Hosking | Associate Professor | Computer Science | Purdue University
305 N. University Street | West Lafayette | IN 47907 | USA
Mobile +1 765 427 5484
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20130407/3f072b33/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the M3devel
mailing list