[M3devel] Fwd: Fork bug

Daniel Alejandro Benavides Diaz danielal.benavides at bancoagrario.gov.co
Fri Jul 11 00:39:41 CEST 2014

Hi all:
We can see this kind of reasoning in the The C++ Programming Language report quote in SPWM3, as it reads like "C++ has a lot of operators and while be explained where and if needed".

This is not reasonable for my, please don't make me attempt return Dragisha :)

Thanks in advance

De: Dragiša Durić [mailto:dragisha at m3w.org]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 09 de Julio de 2014 12:05 a.m.
Para: rodney.m.bates at acm.org
CC: m3devel
Asunto: Re: [M3devel] Fwd: Fork bug

We can implement specific MUTEX subclass with this behavior and use it where its use can be rationalised and where it is needed/correct-thing-to-do.

This way you get specific behavior without (in eyes of most people) breaking up with what has become normal and expected behavior of MUTEXes.

On 08 Jul 2014, at 21:20, Rodney M. Bates <rodney_bates at lcwb.coop<mailto:rodney_bates at lcwb.coop>> wrote:

While we are working on MUTEX, I would like to propose making them
what I believe is meant by a recursive mutex, that is, one thread
can lock multiple times, the mutex being released only when the number
of unlocks catches up with the number of locks.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20140710/fd316e79/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the M3devel mailing list