[M3devel] On the way to release other packages in GPL?

mika at async.caltech.edu mika at async.caltech.edu
Fri Sep 1 22:59:30 CEST 2017


Yeah I didn't mean to imply anything about GPL (or BSD, even, even though
I agree with Jay---I would much prefer that myself, I think that would be 
an ideal outcome, because you can always incorporate BSD software in a 
GPL distribution if that is what you want to do).

The problem as I see it is that the old SRC license has one or two clauses that
make the M3 license effectively "non-free".  Someone with legal authority would
have to give permission to license the system without those clauses.  Ideally
just remove them, in which case I seem to remember the license wouldn't be too
far from BSD...

    Mika

Jay K writes:
>--_000_MWHPR18MB1214FAEB491872008CBDA390E6920MWHPR18MB1214namp_
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Please no. A relicense would be nice though-- BSD.
>
>- Jay
>________________________________
>From: M3devel <m3devel-bounces at elegosoft.com> on behalf of Darko Volaric <l=
>ists at darko.org>
>Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 10:08:00 AM
>To: mika at async.caltech.edu
>Cc: m3devel at elegosoft.com
>Subject: Re: [M3devel] On the way to release other packages in GPL?
>
>Wait, there is a serious move toward releasing under GPL?   Or have I misun=
>derstood this email.
>
>
>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 6:30 PM, mika at async.caltech.edu wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is there some consensus on what precisely needs to be extracted in terms
>> of a release?  The Linux discussion earlier on this list made no sense
>> to me, it almost sounded like someone was wilfully misinterpreting the
>> plain English of the legalese.
>>
>> Also who is/has been the best lead so far?  I can see if I can find
>> someone through various connections...
>>
>>    Mika
>>
>> Hendrik Boom writes:
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 05:27:16PM +0000, Daniel Alejandro Benavides D. =
>wro=3D
>>> te:
>>>> Hello:I fear most viable way to keep te language alive is to GPL it . S=
>oo=3D
>>> n we wont have the resortes to keep alive. Im not understimating anyone =
>her=3D
>>> e. But IMHO is de time to do it.=3DA0Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Any GPL-compatible license will work.  Even MIT.  Possibly even the =3D
>>>
>>> so-called Creative Commons variation on public domain, which is =3D
>>>
>>> meaningful in jurisdictions without a concept of public domain.
>>>
>>> The hard part is liberating the parts of the system that are currently =
>=3D
>>>
>>> inder the existing Modula 3 license.  They will have to be replaced if =
>=3D
>>>
>>> we can't get the copyright owner to respond usefully.
>>>
>>> And that's a lot of work.
>>>
>>> -- hendrik
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> M3devel mailing list
>>> M3devel at elegosoft.com
>>> https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> M3devel mailing list
>> M3devel at elegosoft.com
>> https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel
>
>_______________________________________________
>M3devel mailing list
>M3devel at elegosoft.com
>https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel
>
>--_000_MWHPR18MB1214FAEB491872008CBDA390E6920MWHPR18MB1214namp_
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><html>
><head>
><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>>
><meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Exchange Server">
><!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; pad=
>ding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
></head>
><body>
><div>
><div id=3D"x_compose-container" itemscope=3D"" itemtype=3D"https://schema.o=
>rg/EmailMessage" style=3D"direction:ltr">
><span itemprop=3D"creator" itemscope=3D"" itemtype=3D"https://schema.org/Or=
>ganization"><span itemprop=3D"name"></span></span>
><div>
><div style=3D"direction:ltr">Please no. A relicense would be nice though-- =
>BSD.</div>
><div><br>
></div>
><div class=3D"x_acompli_signature">- Jay</div>
></div>
></div>
><hr tabindex=3D"-1" style=3D"display:inline-block; width:98%">
><div id=3D"x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir=3D"ltr"><font face=3D"Calibri, sans-serif" =
>color=3D"#000000" style=3D"font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> M3devel <m3devel=
>-bounces at elegosoft.com> on behalf of Darko Volaric <lists at darko.org&g=
>t;<br>
><b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 1, 2017 10:08:00 AM<br>
><b>To:</b> mika at async.caltech.edu<br>
><b>Cc:</b> m3devel at elegosoft.com<br>
><b>Subject:</b> Re: [M3devel] On the way to release other packages in GPL?<=
>/font>
><div> </div>
></div>
></div>
><font size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-size:10pt;">
><div class=3D"PlainText">Wait, there is a serious move toward releasing und=
>er GPL?   Or have I misunderstood this email.<br>
><br>
><br>
>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 6:30 PM, mika at async.caltech.edu wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Is there some consensus on what precisely needs to be extracted in ter=
>ms<br>
>> of a release?  The Linux discussion earlier on this list made no =
>sense<br>
>> to me, it almost sounded like someone was wilfully misinterpreting the=
><br>
>> plain English of the legalese.<br>
>> <br>
>> Also who is/has been the best lead so far?  I can see if I can fi=
>nd<br>
>> someone through various connections...<br>
>> <br>
>>    Mika<br>
>> <br>
>> Hendrik Boom writes:<br>
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 05:27:16PM +0000, Daniel Alejandro Ben=
>avides D. wro=3D<br>
>>> te:<br>
>>>> Hello:I fear most viable way to keep te language alive is to G=
>PL it . Soo=3D<br>
>>> n we wont have the resortes to keep alive. Im not understimating a=
>nyone her=3D<br>
>>> e. But IMHO is de time to do it.=3DA0Thanks in advance<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Any GPL-compatible license will work.  Even MIT.  Possib=
>ly even the =3D<br>
>>> <br>
>>> so-called Creative Commons variation on public domain, which is =
>=3D<br>
>>> <br>
>>> meaningful in jurisdictions without a concept of public domain.<br=
>>
>>> <br>
>>> The hard part is liberating the parts of the system that are curre=
>ntly =3D<br>
>>> <br>
>>> inder the existing Modula 3 license.  They will have to be re=
>placed if =3D<br>
>>> <br>
>>> we can't get the copyright owner to respond usefully.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> And that's a lot of work.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> -- hendrik<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> M3devel mailing list<br>
>>> M3devel at elegosoft.com<br>
>>> <a href=3D"https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel"=
>>https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel</a><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> M3devel mailing list<br>
>> M3devel at elegosoft.com<br>
>> <a href=3D"https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel">htt=
>ps://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel</a><br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>M3devel mailing list<br>
>M3devel at elegosoft.com<br>
><a href=3D"https://m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel">https://=
>m3lists.elegosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/m3devel</a><br>
></div>
></span></font>
></body>
></html>
>
>--_000_MWHPR18MB1214FAEB491872008CBDA390E6920MWHPR18MB1214namp_--


More information about the M3devel mailing list