[M3devel] package groups question
Randy Coleburn
rcolebur at scires.com
Sun Aug 2 05:46:38 CEST 2009
Jay:
That's ok with me if you just want to do "std" and leave out "min".
Regards,
Randy
>>> <jay.krell at cornell.edu> 8/1/2009 2:51 AM >>>
| From what I've gleaned in the discussions and the current
documentation, I think most everyone has settled on the idea of having
2 "binary" distributions for this release: "min" and "std".
>
Really? How about just "std" and don't even label it as such? How many
expert users are clamoring for "min"?
There was actually a push for several non overlaping package sets and
Olaf did work for that. But I'm not sure that is worth it.
- Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090801/6a3eafe7/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4550 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090801/6a3eafe7/attachment-0002.bin>
More information about the M3devel
mailing list