[M3devel] package groups question

Randy Coleburn rcolebur at scires.com
Sun Aug 2 05:46:38 CEST 2009


Jay:
That's ok with me if you just want to do "std" and leave out "min".
Regards,
Randy

>>> <jay.krell at cornell.edu> 8/1/2009 2:51 AM >>>
| From what I've gleaned in the discussions and the current  
documentation, I think most everyone has settled on the idea of having  
2 "binary" distributions for this release:  "min" and "std".
>

Really? How about just "std" and don't even label it as such? How many  
expert users are clamoring for "min"?

There was actually a push for several non overlaping package sets and  
Olaf did work for that. But I'm not sure that is worth it.

  - Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090801/6a3eafe7/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4550 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20090801/6a3eafe7/attachment-0002.bin>


More information about the M3devel mailing list