[M3devel] [M3commit] CVS Update: cm3

[Dragiša Durić]

Jay,

What benefit from 4.6 backend do we expect for cm3 if most of optimizer is "optimized out" of cm3cg?

If our "trees" are reason why you must switch optimizations off, is it not more logical to fix our "trees"? One by one, if need be. A look into gm2 (for example), a fix in our backend. That way, future porting to most recent gcc's will be much easier?

TIA,
dd

On Jun 6, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Jay Krell wrote:

> Log message:
> 	remove more of the optimizer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20120606/b01b3600/attachment-0001.html>