[M3devel] zero sized structs?
Jay K
jay.krell at cornell.edu
Thu Oct 4 18:16:00 CEST 2012
Yes..the assertions all passes..but granted, maybe we don't have full coverage. I can look at the frontend, or just make it so in the backend.
On further thought..by quick read..this M3x86.m3 code is questionable.While in_proc is usually false for declare_local, I think it really goes both ways.So it looks like size is sometimes rounded up to 4, sometimes left as zero.
But what does it mean?Does a zero sized array get any storage?In C and C++, two objects can't be at the same address, so, for example:struct foo { } bar; is not legal C. It is legal C++, however:
struct foo { } a,b;assert(&a != &b); will pass.
andvoid* a = malloc(0);void* b = malloc(0);assert(a != b) will also pass in C and C++.
That is, size 0 struct is invalid in C. In C++ it is rounded up to at least 1.malloc(0) is rounded up to at least 1.No two "objects" can have the same address.
What is the meaning Modula-3?Rounding up to 1 or alignment seems easy/decent.Certainly these zero sized things are rare in our tree.
- Jay
CC: m3devel at elegosoft.com
From: antony.hosking at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [M3devel] zero sized structs?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:21:28 -0400
To: jay.krell at cornell.edu
Try to respect alignment.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 4, 2012, at 2:25 AM, Jay K <jay.krell at cornell.edu> wrote:
declare_local noArgs 0 8 Struct -1522787086 T F 50 v.318
and here is some relevant M3x86 code:
IF u.in_proc THEN v := get_temp_var (u, type, s, a, n); ELSE v := create_temp_var (u, type, s, a, n); END;
PROCEDURE get_temp_var (u: U; type: Type; s: ByteSize; a: Alignment; n: Name := M3ID.NoID): x86Var = BEGIN
(* round size and alignment up to 4 *)
IF s < 4 THEN s := 4; END;
IF a < 4 THEN a := 4; END;
PROCEDURE create_temp_var (u: U; type: Type; s: ByteSize; a: Alignment; n: Name): x86Var = VAR v := NewVar(u, type, 0, s, a, n); BEGIN v.loc := VLoc.temp; v.parent := u.current_proc;
u.current_proc.framesize := Word.And(u.current_proc.framesize + a - 1, Alignmask[a]);
INC(u.current_proc.framesize, s);
v.offset := -u.current_proc.framesize;
RETURN v; END create_temp_var;
which isn't clear by inspection...it actually looks likezero size is allowed through commonly...in_proc is rare,so create is common...assuming the frame is already aligned,the size remains unchanged...
Relevant aside: I have been ignoring alignment.I'm inclined to go with something like:
<* ASSERT (size MOD alignment) = 0 *>
If that ever fails, then I will change it to:
FUNCTION RoundUp(a, b: INTEGER): INTEGER =BEGIN WITH c = a MOD b DO IF c # 0 THEN RETURN a + b - c; END; END; RETURN a;END;
size := RoundUp(size, alignment);
and then, more to the point, I'll go with:
IF size = 0 THEN size = 1;END;
I haven't dug into what the gcc backend would do here, too muchto dig through. :)
Thoughts?
I guess I should try both m3x86 and m3cc, and print the addressof these things????
- Jay
From: jay.krell at cornell.edu
To: m3devel at elegosoft.com
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 06:13:28 +0000
Subject: [M3devel] zero sized structs?
Building obliqrt I get:
****** runtime error:*** <*ASSERT*> failed.*** file "../src/M3C.m3", line 1768***
PROCEDURE GetStructSizes_Declare(self: GetStructSizes_t; type: Type; byte_size: ByteSize): M3CG.Var =BEGIN IF type = Type.Struct THEN <* ASSERT byte_size > 0 *> self.sizes[self.count] := byte_size; INC(self.count); END; RETURN NIL;END GetStructSizes_Declare;
due to presumably:
PROCEDURE ApplyThreadClosure (self: ObliqThreadClosure): REFANY = VAR noArgs: ARRAY [0 .. -1] OF ObValue.Val;
...
PROCEDURE HandleWork (self: ObliqWork) = VAR noArgs: ARRAY [0 .. -1] OF ObValue.Val;
..PROCEDURE EvalThread ( self : PackageThread;...noArgs : ARRAY [0 .. -1] OF ObValue.Val;
What is the meaning of this?
- Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20121004/719e20ef/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the M3devel
mailing list