[M3devel] zero sized structs?

[Jay]

> No storage.
 

That has been thought through and all ramifications are ok? And gcc backend does what is expected? -- multiple variables have same address. I'll answer some of the questions later -- try out gcc backend and NT/x86. NT/x86 looks "inconsistent" between variable at top of procedure vs sub blocks.

 The C/C++ design feels more conservative and safe and also reasonable and cheap enough.


 - Jay (briefly/pocket-sized-computer-aka-phone)

On Oct 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Antony Hosking <hosking at cs.purdue.edu> wrote:

> No storage.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://m3lists.elegosoft.com/pipermail/m3devel/attachments/20121004/0c55b0c8/attachment-0002.html>